Why Nevada Riders Face Serious Risk
Nevada's scenic highways and year-round riding weather make it a favorite for motorcyclists, but the same wide, fast roads that draw riders also produce dangerous collisions. Many motorcycle crashes happen because a driver simply did not see the rider — at intersections, during lane changes, or when turning left across traffic. Without the steel cage, airbags, and crumple zones that protect car occupants, riders frequently suffer fractures, road rash, spinal injuries, and traumatic brain injuries even when wearing a helmet.
Overcoming Bias Against Riders
Insurance adjusters often assume the motorcyclist was speeding or riding recklessly, regardless of what actually happened. A skilled attorney counters that bias with hard evidence — scene reconstruction, witness statements, traffic camera footage, and the physical damage to both vehicles — to show the truth about how the crash occurred and who was responsible.
Nevada Helmet and Fault Rules
Nevada requires all motorcycle riders and passengers to wear a helmet that meets federal standards. While not wearing a helmet does not bar a claim outright, it can become an argument the insurer uses to reduce compensation for head injuries. Under Nevada's modified comparative negligence rule under NRS 41.141, which lets you recover as long as you are not more than 50 percent at fault, you can still recover even if you were partly at fault, with your award reduced by your share.
Compensation for Motorcycle Injuries
Because motorcycle injuries tend to be catastrophic, claims often involve emergency and reconstructive surgery, long rehabilitation, permanent scarring or disability, lost income, and significant pain and suffering. Capturing the full lifetime cost of a serious injury — not just today's bills — is central to a strong motorcycle claim.
Injured in Nevada? Get a free, confidential case review today. There's no obligation, and you pay no fee unless you win. Call 973-566-5599.
Frequently Asked Questions
Nevada law requires helmets, and going without one can be used to argue for reduced damages on head injuries — but it does not automatically bar your claim. Speak with an attorney about your specific situation.
Generally two years from the date of the crash under NRS 11.190(4)(e).
Quite possibly. Nevada's comparative negligence rule lets you recover unless you were more than 50 percent at fault, and adjusters often blame riders unfairly.
This page is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. For guidance on your specific situation, consult a licensed Nevada attorney.