In This Article
Many serious injuries are caused by more than one party — a negligent driver and a poorly maintained road, or a property owner and a maintenance contractor. Nevada has specific rules for apportioning fault among multiple defendants, and those rules directly affect how much you can collect and from whom.
Several Liability in Nevada
Nevada generally follows several liability under NRS 41.141, meaning each defendant is typically responsible only for its own percentage of fault rather than the entire judgment. If one defendant is 70 percent at fault and another 30 percent, each pays its share. This differs from joint liability and affects collection strategy.
Why Identifying All Defendants Matters
Because each defendant pays only its share, finding every responsible party maximizes your total recovery. Overlooking a liable contractor, employer, or manufacturer can leave money on the table — especially if one defendant is uninsured or insolvent and cannot pay its portion.
Exceptions to Several Liability
Certain situations, such as cases involving concerted action or specific statutory exceptions, can alter the standard rule. Strategic property cases and intentional-tort scenarios may be treated differently, which is why the apportionment analysis should be handled by an experienced attorney.
Free Multi-Defendant Review
If your injury involved more than one party, a free review can help identify every responsible defendant and explain how Nevada's apportionment rules affect your recovery.