In This Article
Nevada's open highways and year-round riding weather make it popular with motorcyclists — and unfortunately, riders who are injured in crashes face a hidden obstacle: the assumption that the motorcyclist must have been at fault. Recognizing and countering this bias is essential to a fair recovery.
The Stereotype Insurers Exploit
Many people, including some jurors and adjusters, unconsciously assume riders are speeding daredevils. Insurance companies lean into that bias to shift blame onto the rider under Nevada's comparative negligence rule, even when the driver of a car clearly caused the crash by turning left or failing to see the motorcycle.
Why Rider Injuries Are So Severe
With no enclosure or airbags, motorcyclists absorb the full force of a collision. Even at moderate speeds, crashes produce fractures, road rash, traumatic brain injuries, and spinal damage. The severity of these injuries makes full and fair compensation especially important.
Evidence That Counters the Bias
Objective proof — scene measurements, vehicle damage patterns, traffic-camera footage, and helmet and gear evidence — can dismantle the assumption that the rider was reckless. Establishing that the rider was visible, lawful, and careful neutralizes the insurer's favorite argument.
Standing Up for Injured Riders
Riders deserve the same fair treatment as any other injured person. An advocate who anticipates the bias and builds the record to overcome it can make a decisive difference. If you were hurt while riding in Nevada, a free review can help protect your rights.